Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
Article Info
Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose شماره 115

volume Number : 18
number In Volume : 9
issue Number : 115

Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 18، number In Volume 9، ، issue Number 115

Initialization and focalization in Persian: Syntactic, phonetic, morphological mechanisms and their interaction

Narges Rahmani , Mohammad Reza Oroji (Author in Charge), Hooman Bijani

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This paper presents a systematic and in-depth investigation of two core processes in the Information Structure of the Persian language: Topicalization and Focalization. Topicalization identifies the discourse "Topic" by promoting a constituent to the sentence-initial position. A notable phenomenon is the co-occurrence of the object marker «را» (râ) with non-object constituents in this process, emphasizing Aboutness and Definiteness/Specificity. Focalization is responsible for highlighting "new, contrastive, or emphatic information" (Focus).

METHODOLOGY: This descriptive-analytical study collected its data using library research techniques. The data was gathered purposively, selecting sentences that researchers identified as involving phonological, morphological, or syntactic Topicalization or Focalization. Employing the theoretical framework of the Minimalist Program and Functionalist approaches, the present article describes, analyzes, and compares these mechanisms, their interaction with each other and with the phenomenon of Topicalization, and examines the role of the marker «را» (râ).

FINDINGS: Persian utilizes three distinct yet often overlapping strategies: “Syntactic Focalization” relies on the movement (Scrambling) of a constituent to dedicated syntactic positions like [Spec, FocP]. “Phonological Focalization” is based on applying Heavy Stress/Accent to the intended element in its original grammatical position. “Morphological Focalization” employs Focus Markers such as «که» (ke) immediately following the focal constituent.

CONCLUSION: Topicalization acts as an efficient tool for introducing and tracking discourse topics by promoting a wide range of constituents (objects, complements, adverbs) to the sentence-initial position, i.e., the specifier of the Topic node. A prominent and controversial feature of Persian is the co-occurrence of the marker «را» (râ) with non-object constituents in this position. Focalization is achieved through syntactic movement by relocating a constituent to the specifier of the Focus node, through applying heavy stress to the constituent in its base grammatical position, and also through the use of the in-situ focus marker «که» (ke), which indicates contrastive focus.

Keyword
focalization , focus , focus marker , information structure , scrambling , topic , topicalization

Reference
  • Afrashi, A., Azimi, Z., & Hemati, M. (2016). The role of information structure in Persian word order: A corpus-based study. Language Related Research, 7(2), 1–24. [In Persian]
  • Büring, D. (2016). Intonation and meaning. Oxford University Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris Publications.
  • Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). MIT Press.
  • Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (1982). Object Complementation in Persian. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 12(1), 61–75.
  • Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (1992). On the (in)dependence of syntax and pragmatics: Evidence from the postposition -ra in Persian. In Cooperating with written texts: The pragmatics and comprehension of written texts (pp. 549–573). De Gruyter.
  • Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (2006). On topicalization and specificity in Persian. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the Iranian Society for Western Linguistics (ISWL). Tehran, Iran.
  • Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (2013). Typology of Iranian languages: Persian. In The Oxford handbook of Iranian languages (pp. 486–499). Oxford University Press.
  • Faghiri, P., Samvelian, P., & Hemforth, B. (2014). Persian word order: An experimental study. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 36 (36), 2061–2066.
  • Ghomeshi, J. (1996). Projection and inflection: A study of Persian phrase structure [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  • Ghomeshi, J. (2001). Control and thematic agreement in Persian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 46(1–2), 9–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100001722
  • Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction (Vol. 1). John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Karimi, S. (1989). Aspects of Persian syntax, specificity, and the theory of grammar [Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  • Karimi, S. (1999). A note on parasitic gaps and specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 704–713.
  • Karimi, S. (2003). On object positions, specificity, and scrambling in Persian. In Word order and scrambling (pp. 91–124). Blackwell.
  • Karimi, S. (2005). A minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Karimi, S. (2008). Scrambling and information structure in Persian. In Scrambling (pp. 243–273). John Benjamins.
  • Karimi, S., & Taleghani, A. (2007). The syntax of Persian “ke”: A case of focus movement. Journal of Linguistics, 43(3), 531–560.
  • Krifka, M. (2007). Basic notions of information structure. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, 6, 13–55.
  • Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lazard, G. (1992). A grammar of contemporary Persian. Mazda Publishers.
  • Meshahdipoory, M. (1994). Stress and intonation in Persian. Tehran University Press.
  • Meshahdipoory, M. (2002). The role of prosody in Persian information structure. Journal of Linguistics, 10, 45–67.
  • Modarresi Ghavami, G. (2014). Word order and information structure in Persian: A corpus-based study [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran].
  • Oroji, M. R., & Rezaei, A. (2013). Exploring ‘ke’ as a focus particle in Persian from both form and function points of view. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 33(1), 76-84.
  • Rahmani, Z. (2007). Scrambling and information structure in Persian [Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht].
  • Rasekhmahand, M. (2006). The relation between syntactic scrambling and emphasis in Persian. Journal of Linguistics (Dastoor), 2, 20–33.[In Persian]
  • Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar (pp. 281–337). Springer.
  • Rooth, M. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1(1), 75–116.
  • Sameei, H. (2014). The syntax of focus in Persian [Doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa].
  • Samvelian, P. (2007). What ‘ra’ tells us about Persian differential object marking. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 275–292.
  • Samvelian, P. (2012). A (phrasal) affix analysis of the Persian Ezafe. Journal of Linguistics, 48(2), 345–380.
  • Van Valin, R. D. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge University Press.